Authored by attorney Gretchen Ostroff
During its last legislative session, the North Carolina legislature passed House Bill 476, which changed the law regarding pre-excavation underground utility identification and safe digging practices in North Carolina. Under prior law, many important issues related to underground utility identification were not addressed. The changes, which are codified at North Carolina General Statutes, Chapter 87, Article 8A, create mandatory underground utility procedures in North Carolina similar to what is required under Virginia’s Miss Utility laws and regulations.
Perhaps the biggest change implemented by the new law was the creation of a “Notification Center” (NC811), which all North Carolina operators are required to join. The Notification Center serves as a clearinghouse for information regarding the location of underground utilities, proposed excavations and demolitions, and reports of alleged violations.
In addition to creating the Notification Center, the new law implemented the following changes and clarifications to existing law:
For more information, and to see a summary of all changes made under the new law, visit http://www.nc811.org/.
To read the full text of the statute, visit http://www.ncga.state.nc.us/EnactedLegislation/Statutes/HTML/ByArticle/Chapter_87/Article_8A.html.
 “Operator” is defined as “any person, public utility, communications or cable services provider, municipality, electrical utility, or electric or telephone cooperative that owns or operates a facility in the state.”
You must read and accept these terms in order to send us email.
Use of this website for communication does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter for which we do not already represent you. Please do not send any confidential or privileged information electronically via this website unless we have already agreed to represent you.
If you send us information electronically via this website, you agree that our review of that information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if it is highly confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.