Authored by attorneys Brett M. Saunders and Brian L. Sykes
Many practitioners in the field of workers’ compensation are aware of the “death presumption.” The rule is often understood as this: when an employee is found dead at his place of work, there is a presumption that a compensable injury has occurred. However, this is not the case. Although such a presumption does exist, it is severely limited in scope and rarely applicable to a workers’ compensation claim.
Knowing the limited scope of the presumption can be extremely valuable to practitioners because the presumption itself carries significant weight with the court. This article is intended to explain Virginia’s death presumption and examine the many caveats to its application by examining the purpose and effect of the death presumption, its origin and history, and its application by the courts.
Click here to view, or download the full article.
This article originally appeared in the Journal of Civil Litigation, Vol. 27, No. 1 (Spring 2015), a publication of the Virginia Association of Defense Attorneys. It appears here with permission.
Attorney Advertising. This Web site may be considered advertising under the rules of some states. Prior results described on this site cannot and do not guarantee or predict a similar outcome with respect to any future matter that we or any lawyer may be retained to handle. See full disclaimer
© 2015 Vandeventer Black LLP
101 West Main Street, Suite 500, Norfolk, Virginia 23510
You must read and accept these terms in order to send us email.
Use of this website for communication does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship for any legal matter for which we do not already represent you. Please do not send any confidential or privileged information electronically via this website unless we have already agreed to represent you.
If you send us information electronically via this website, you agree that our review of that information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if it is highly confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you.